Buttery. Complex. Oaky. Silky. Ample. Easy-drinking. But beautiful?
Take away the smooth, curvy bottle and classy label and can an Italian wine be considered beautiful?
“Of course, it can,” says Kevin Sweeney, University of Tampa associate professor of philosophy.
As
a researcher of aesthetics, Sweeney goes beyond the boundaries of art
and music, challenging scholars and others to find the beauty in such
things as wine and food. He recently spoke at the Philosophy of Wine
Conference in Pollenzo, Italy, on “Wine Evaluation and Expertise.”
“Traditionally,
philosophers thought the concept of beauty could only apply to the
senses of sight and sound, but an object of taste could not be
beautiful,” says Dr. Kevin Sweeney, associate professor of philosophy.
There
are two kinds of taste, he says: the taste that happens when you put
something in your mouth (the gustatory experience) and critical taste
(your taste in art or how you decorate your apartment). He argues that,
once you get beyond your initial reaction to a wine, you can start to
evaluate its beauty based on objective terms of critical taste.
“With the first sip of wine you’re just starting to get to know it,” he says. “It might take a little while.
You
have to go back and taste the wine on other occasions to really come to
a position about whether you think it’s a good wine.”
For instance, as a Barolo matures, it will have an aroma of violets and tar. It will develop more depth, qualities and smells.
“The
wine develops a structure,” he says. “As you drink it, the tastes
change, and you start noticing interesting relations to taste.”
Sweeney plans to compile his research efforts into a book on the subject of philosophy and food.